| Author |
Message |
|
turboawdfanatic
Moderator
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:39 pm
Posts: 3013
Location: La Habra
|
 Detailed 2.3L stroker technical info Found this link at mitsustyle.com. Even if you're not interested in a stroker, its still great info on engines in general. I've only read about a 1/3rd of it so far and I've learned quite a bit. Check it out (it's a PDF, download it and open it): http://www.kidzuku.com/StrokeOrNot.pdf
|
| Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:41 pm |
 
|
|
|
SOADweskey
No More 2.3L
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 7:36 pm
Posts: 4412
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Re: Detailed 2.3L stroker technical info That thing is a great read. Helped me understand more about engines in general. I thought I had given that file to you already Clint. Sorry I'm a dick for not sharing and thank you for being cooler than me and sharing it with everyone.
_________________
Boost Creep is your turbo's way of calling you a little bitch for not running enough boost.
452 AWHP 446 lb ft of torque e85 FTW!!
"They are cool manly men now those DSM owners. Before it was just pasty white nerds, metro hair Asian kids and fruit pickers. They do real car club stuff and everything. Sometimes they even spend money here :-/"
-Mike W
|
| Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:50 pm |
|
|
|
4GRIDER
BANNED 4 LIFE!
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:48 pm
Posts: 973
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Re: Detailed 2.3L stroker technical info This may not have much to do about the subject. But doesn't John Sheperd run a 2.0 4G63. And last time i read his web-page he was making over 1000hp....Is a 2.3 stroker cabable or is running 2.0 better.? Cuz like i said, and even though you guys tell me not to do it, or may just not believe me, i am going to build a drag car. And i would like to know if i'd be better off with the stock 2.0 or the 2.3 stroker? DO you guys have any toughts on what will be better for drag.
_________________|DIAMOND-STAR-MOTORS||4G63T_RACING|
|
| Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:01 pm |
|
|
|
SOADweskey
No More 2.3L
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 7:36 pm
Posts: 4412
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Re: Detailed 2.3L stroker technical info In my opinion a 2.0 is a better drag engine since you can spin it to a higher RPM than a 2.3.
I'm hoping that my 2.3 will be real good for auto-cross and tight road courses as it should have better low end torque and spool faster.
_________________
Boost Creep is your turbo's way of calling you a little bitch for not running enough boost.
452 AWHP 446 lb ft of torque e85 FTW!!
"They are cool manly men now those DSM owners. Before it was just pasty white nerds, metro hair Asian kids and fruit pickers. They do real car club stuff and everything. Sometimes they even spend money here :-/"
-Mike W
|
| Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:03 pm |
|
|
|
turboawdfanatic
Moderator
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:39 pm
Posts: 3013
Location: La Habra
|
Re: Detailed 2.3L stroker technical info
|
| Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:48 am |
|
|
|
4GRIDER
BANNED 4 LIFE!
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:48 pm
Posts: 973
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Re: Detailed 2.3L stroker technical info Yea i did read it. But i want personal opinions from you guys. Thats why i am in the forum. If i had to just research for everything theyre' is no point on me being here. But thanks. I dont mind loosing a lil low end since i will be running Nitrous.
_________________|DIAMOND-STAR-MOTORS||4G63T_RACING|
|
| Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:33 pm |
|
|
|
Erix
Senior Member
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 7:10 pm
Posts: 4767
Location: 818
|
Re: Detailed 2.3L stroker technical info lets try to stick to the topic.
if you need opinions on future car plans, start your own topic please.
_________________
Current: '97 GS-T Spyder Past: '90 2.0L GS Turbo, '98 GS-T Spyder, '90 1.8L GS
|
| Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:55 pm |
|
|
